[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Begin Last Call on draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-06

I agree with Chris and think that this is largely an implementation concern for vendors who as far as I know have done the 'right' thing in this space for years (barring bugs). However, this is something that may be worth a mention in the filtering capabilities document, if it isn't already........or miscellaneous capabilities..... 

- merike

On Jul 24, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:



On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Zhao Ye wrote:
In section 2.4.2, I think that route redistribution filter and processing 
routing protocol
packets at a higher priority than normal packets might be mentioned.
What's your opinion?


Is that a practice or something the devices do bby 'default' ?? In my
experience for large networking devices (generally cpe/customer folks by and large can't figure out QOS anyway) this is 'done by default' and not a 
'practice' as such.

Unless I missed the point of 'practice' which could be...




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-opsec@psg.com [mailto:owner-opsec@psg.com] On
Behalf Of Ross Callon
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:02 AM
To: opsec@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Begin Last Call on draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-06

This begins working group last call on
draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-06
"Operational Security Current Practices".  The last call will
terminate two weeks from tomorrow (Tuesday August 8th).

Comments to the list please.

thanks, Ross