[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Comments on draft-zhao-opsec-routing-capabilities-01.txt



All IP routing protocols send traffic a prec6. Routers then use that precedence value to make judgments on which packets to drop during a congested event - minimizing the dropping of control plane packets. 

It just so happens that DOS is a "congested event," turning QOS in the router into the #1 most critical security tool.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Merike Kaeo [mailto:merike@doubleshotsecurity.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 3:25 PM
> To: gmj@pobox.com
> Cc: opsec@ops.ietf.org; Barry Greene (bgreene)
> Subject: Re: Comments on draft-zhao-opsec-routing-capabilities-01.txt
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'm not aware of prec6 and would gladly talk to folks who are 
> deploying/using it and incorporate into my current practices 
> doc.  I'll be at NANOG and although I am leaving Tuesday at 
> 1PM, I would make myself available for any discussions on 
> Sunday eve through the time I leave.  Note that there is an 
> OPsec BoF scheduled for 2-3:30 on Tuesday and despite 
> requesting a timeslot that doesn't conflict with my leaving 
> it wasn't in the cards.  Someone else will be presenting my 
> slides.....essentially just a synopsis of current document 
> and request for input if things are missing......
> 
> - - merike
> 
> On Jun 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, George Jones wrote:
> 
> > On 6/1/06, Barry Greene (bgreene) <bgreene@cisco.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Why I'm I not seeing level set discussion around Prec6 as 
> the primary 
> >> defense tool used to protocol routing protocols? Is this something 
> >> that people even realize is happening - live - operationally on 
> >> networks  right this minute?
> >
> >  Suggest you take that up with the  authors  (cc here  for more 
> > discussion),  I'm just the framework guy here now.
> >
> >  If there are practices that are current, they can be added 
> either to 
> > Merike's  doc (current practices) or to the capabilities drafts (if 
> > her's gets published  and something needs to be added later).
> >
> >  I suggest if you have something to add you write up a quick 
> > suggestion  in the standard format:
> >
> >    Capability:
> >
> >       The devce is able to...
> >
> >    Supported Practice:
> >
> >     Operators currently do FOO...
> >
> >    Current Implemetnations:
> >
> >     Cite, hopefully in a generic/vendor neutral way, how 
> this is done 
> > in products today
> >
> >    Issues:
> >
> >     This may cause the end of the world if....
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  ---George
> >
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQFEf2lGReOZMB6zE7IRAm5cAKCH5mmVXHEX7hmqOO2f1FGSJYOn5wCghAbU
> ZekcadC7O6mR0qOuKHOXLcQ=
> =bola
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>