[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: action RPC I-D
Hello,
David B Harrington wrote:
Hi,
At the IAB Workshop, one of the strong points was that operators want
to be able to "read" the content on the wire. Adding such regex
formatting will make the content much less human-friendly.
You do not need regexp formating for action. I put in callingPoint just to avoid this.
Where do you see regular expressions in the draft?
I think the action increases the difficulty of access control
specification, and increases the likelihood of non-interoperable
commands.
I believe that there will always be vendor specific actions as there are vendor specific
CLI commands today. For me the question is really just how to handle them? <action>
operation or new operation every time. If you have an <action> operation defined in the
data model then at least you have a place to put the access control information (in the
DM). How does using separate new operations defined in a non machine digestible document
make access control easier ?
Balazs
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>