RE: I-D ACTION:draft-kulkarni-netconf-subagent-prot-00.txt

["Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <dromasca@avaya.com>]

 A very good observation. The AgentX work happened after many years of
operational experience and deployment of 'monolithic' agents, and in the
conditions when at least three different software packages that I
remember were offering agent-subagent SNMP stacks. 

Dan
(contributor)
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:00 PM
> To: Martin Bjorklund
> Cc: bwijnen@lucent.com; netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-kulkarni-netconf-subagent-prot-00.txt
> 
>  >...
> 
> > Anyway, I agree that this isn't high on the priority list, and we 
> > should probably collect real-world experience before doing this.
> > 
> 
> Agree 110%
> The AgentX work was done after many years of experience with 
> the SNMP protocol, and after multiple high-quality 
> implementations of a master-agent/sub-agent system.
> 
> > 
> > /martin
> 
> Andy
> 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>