[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI

To: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
Subject: Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:09:10 +0200
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <789E617C880666438EDEE30C2A3E8D10EE62@mailsrvnt05.enet.sharplabs.com>
References: <789E617C880666438EDEE30C2A3E8D10EE62@mailsrvnt05.enet.sharplabs.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)

McDonald, Ira wrote:
 > And a data model and single namespace should be able to

span a tree of XSD files, not just a single file.


Could you explain this a bit more.

Yes in design and during model specification it is really important to be able to usemultiple files. But is it needed when the device presents it's data model on the wire ?

Balazs

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

References:
- RE: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
  - From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
Next by Date: Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
Previous by thread: RE: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
Next by thread: Re: Do we need data modeling rules like an SMI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread