Re: XCAP to Proposed Standard

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Andy Bierman" <ietf@andybierman.com>
> To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> Cc: <netconf@ops.ietf.org>; "Ops-Nm (E-mail)" <ops-nm@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 2:21 PM
> Subject: Re: XCAP to Proposed Standard
...
> 5) In a general sense there is clearly overlap between NETCONF and XCAP.
>     I think NETCONF tries to be more content and transport independent,
>     and the RPC-based architecture is more suited to standard and vendor
>     "specialized RPC" extensions, which provide a more natural
>     programming paradigm than a model based on XML document manipulation.
...

However, treating configuration data as document content makes use
of existing configuration management specifications (webdav / deltav)
conceivable.

Randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>