[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XCAP to Proposed Standard
Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
The XML Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP) -
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-simple-xcap-11.txt
developped in the simple WG is on the agenda of the 7/6 IESG telechat.
I looked this document over, which is not a review of any sort,
but I have a few questions:
1) Is this intended only for use with SIP?
2) Is there any access control model for securing data?
(What is the security model?)
3) Is there a persistence model for data?
(IMO there are problems with trying to abstract a NE device
configuration as an XML document, and this is one of them)
4) The examples would be easier to read if the XML was pretty-printed.
5) In a general sense there is clearly overlap between NETCONF and XCAP.
I think NETCONF tries to be more content and transport independent,
and the RPC-based architecture is more suited to standard and vendor
"specialized RPC" extensions, which provide a more natural
programming paradigm than a model based on XML document manipulation.
Andy
2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date
RAI The Extensible Markup Language (XML) Configuration Access Protocol
(XCAP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-simple-xcap-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Note that this document was pulled from the RFC Editor queue
and is returning with some changes, which are recorded in the tracker.
Token: Jon Peterson
Please let me know if there any questions or concerns until Wednesday
7/5 COB.
Dan
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>