RE: Scalability as requirement

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

All nice that it has been added to the list.

But (as far as I understand), the list is currently just a 
collection of things that various people have posted to this list.

In no way does it (yet) represent any consensus of this WG. 
Is there any plan to try and see if we as a WG 
can in fact get any consensus on what the need/requirements are?

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org]On
> Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 15:19
> To: Balazs Lengyel
> Cc: Netconf (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Scalability as requirement
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> > Jurgen,
> > Could you please add scalability to your requirements page. 
> After the 
> > discussions I believe we require that the protocol should 
> allow 30.000 to 
> > 100.000 nodes to send notifications to a management station 
> and the station 
> > should be able to order the 100.000 nodes to send the notifications.
> 
> Added to the list.
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
> <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 
> 28725 Bremen, Germany
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>