Re: NETCONF over TLS?

[Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>]

Eliot Lear wrote:
> There's no reason you couldn't do this with TLS/BEEP, right?

Right.
So we already have this covered, except you
have to implement BEEP.  I think that was
the point of the original question.  Like I said,
just curious -- not trying to create new work at all.


> Eliot

Andy

> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Somebody sent me an email and asked if the WG was
> > interested in NETCONF over TLS.  I said probably
> > not.  This morning I saw this I-D in Last Call
> > to supply a user name to TLS, an obvious missing
> > component is you want to support a user-based
> > access-control model (and I do).
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-santesson-tls-ume-04.txt
> >
> > So now I am curious (but not enough to standardize
> > anything) if the secure syslog integration with netconf
> > over TLS makes security and operational sense.
> >
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>