[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Interim attendance survey
Hi,
I am willing to attend an interim. At this point, I am not particular
about the date or location.
I don't fit into any of the four categories provided.
I am not convinced we have justified notifications adequately, and am
willing to attend an interm meeting to discuss the goals that underlie
including notifications in the Netconf protocol.
David Harrington
dharrington@huawei.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: Sharon Chisholm
> Cc: Netconf (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Interim attendance survey
>
>
> Sharon Chisholm wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > There were a number of people who said they could attend
> depending on
> > location and dates. Let's try some other dates
> >
> > 3. Week of May 8th
> > 4. Week of May 15th
> > 5. Week of June 5th
> >
>
> I want to make sure there is time to publish
> an updated draft before the I-D cutoff for Montreal.
>
> I think the most realistic choices would be in
> Montreal, either before (Th, July 6 - Sat, July 8)
> or after (Fri July 14 - Sun July 16) IETF #66.
>
>
> > where 1 was week of May 22nd and 2 was week of May 29th.
> >
> > Of course, we could also consider a series of
> teleconference, but it is
> > difficult to get a timeslot that works for everyone.
>
> I am considering another approach.
> Putting your document on the shelf and forcing
> the WG to write a Requirements specification first.
> The current draft doesn't even have a Requirements section.
>
> We have no agreement on why we need notifications
> in NETCONF and what specific roles they serve.
> We don't event agree on whether notification content
> is part of the problem space or not.
>
> I could argue that the SYSLOG WG should standardize the
> protocol and contents for system logging messages, not NETCONF.
> There are some people (including myself) who think
> that if we are going to work on data models, we should
> work on configuration data models, not notification content.
>
>
>
> >
> > Sharon
>
> Andy
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Bierman [mailto:ietf@andybierman.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:14 AM
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> > Cc: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:ZZ00:EXCH]; Netconf (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: Interim attendance survey
> >
> >
> > Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >> I am not sure either about what week we are talking.
> >>
> >> If this is about the week of May 22, I cannot make it at all.
> >>
> >> If it's the week of May 29, I could possibly make May
> 29-31, but need
> >> to be back to Israel in the morning of June 1st.
> >>
> >> The first week of June would be much better.
> >
> > I am just trying to get an idea of who would show up.
> > So far (besides the authors and 1 co-chair, which doesn't
> > even count) there are about 2 people who can attend
> > an interim at the end of May in London.
> >
> > I don't think there is enough interest to hold an interim.
> >
> > If the interim is too late, then there won't
> > enough time afterwards to get a new draft out
> > before the I-D cutoff for Montreal.
> >
> >
> >> Dan
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
> >>> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:21 PM
> >>> To: Netconf (E-mail)
> >>> Subject: RE: Interim attendance survey
> >>>
> >>> hi
> >>>
> >>> I take it this date is based on availability of a venue
> or something?
> >>>
> >>> I have a personal commitment in Ottawa the morning of May
> >>> 27th. If we do that week, if we can do it earlier in the week
> >>> to ensure I'm back (not jet lagged might be too much to ask
> >>> for), I'd really appreciate it.
> >>>
> >>> Sharon
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
> >>> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> >>> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 7:54 PM
> >>> To: Orly Nicklass
> >>> Cc: Netconf (E-mail)
> >>> Subject: Re: Interim attendance survey
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Orly Nicklass wrote:
> >>>> Option 2 that might turn to 3 if it takes place 1st or 2nd
> >>> weekend of
> >>>
> >>>> June in the US.
> >>> Nope. Last week in May in London, UK
> >>>
> >>> Andy
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org
> >>> with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text
> > body.
> >>> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org
> >>> with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text
> > body.
> >>> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> to unsubscribe send a message to
> netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the
> >
> >> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> >> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>