Re: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-netconf-beep

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yes but, there remains an inconsistency with a solid
> requirement of the protocol spec. I don't see how you
> can expect the IESG to approve in the same meeting a draft
> that says you MUST do something and another draft that
> says you don't need to. Would you rather I put a DISCUSS
> on the protocol spec?
>
> (I assume the terminology issue will get fixed and isn't
> contentious.)

No, my personal preference is to go with two capabilities.  Barring
objections from WG I will send proposed text later today.

Eliot

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>