RE: Capabilities and MIBs

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>]

Hi,

Are you referring to SNMP (SMIv1 or v2) MIBs, or are you talking about
data models designed for use with netconf?

I think it is important to make the distinction between (SNMP) MIBs
and netconf data models.

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vincent Cridlig
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:32 AM
> To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Capabilities and MIBs
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like that our agent advertises its supported "MIBs".
> Are capabilities the regular way to do it ?
> 
> Like, for example, for the agent to advertise that it 
> supports "bgp" MIB, "routes" MIB and "network interfaces" MIB.
> 
> <hello xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
>   <capabilities>
>     <capability>urn:ietf:params:netconf:base:1.0</capability>
>     
> <capability>urn:ietf:params:netconf:capability:startup:1.0</ca
> pability>
>     <capability>urn:madynes:module:bgp</capability>
>     <capability>urn:madynes:module:routes</capability>
>     <capability>urn:madynes:module:interfaces</capability>
>   </capabilities>
>   <session-id>4</session-id>
> </hello>
> 
> Is it acceptable ?
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Vincent Cridlig
> 
> 
> 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>