[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?

To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
Subject: Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:00:30 -0500
Cc: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>, "'Sharon Chisholm'" <schishol@nortel.com>, "Netconf (E-mail)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:39:38 PST." <43D9257A.9000403@andybierman.com>

Andy Bierman writes:
>I thought I was the only one who hated namespaces. ;-)

Namespaces are a pain.  Anyone who says otherwise is selling
something.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- XML Namespace labels (was Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?)
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

References:
- Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: netconf notification transport issues
Next by Date: XML Namespace labels (was Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?)
Previous by thread: Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?
Next by thread: XML Namespace labels (was Re: How should we deal with experimental netconf work?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread