RE: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard

["Rob Enns" <rpe@juniper.net>]

> Is it really really necessary to refer back to RFC1630?    RFC3986
> is the current URI syntax document, and has the benefit of
> being standards-track.  Since the reference seems to be for the
> purpose of "defining" the URI, surely the (current) syntax document
> would be appropriate?

RFC3986 looks perfect, thanks.

Rob

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>