[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Last Call: 'NETCONF Configuration Protocol' to Proposed Standard


On the first point:

Pekka Savola wrote:

There is one potential procedural with it, as one normative reference:

   [5]  Berners-Lee, T., "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW: A
        Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and Addresses of
        Objects on the Network as used in the World-Wide Web", RFC 1630,
        June 1994.
.. is Informational. The rules have been stretched now and then (e.g., when referring to hash functions defined in informational RFCs but the function is really defined by some external document), not sure if this is one similar case. Maybe a different ref would be findable on URIs? 



Is it really really necessary to refer back to RFC1630?    RFC3986
is the current URI syntax document, and has the benefit of
being standards-track.  Since the reference seems to be for the
purpose of "defining" the URI, surely the (current) syntax document
would be appropriate?

Leslie.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>