RE: few comments on the prot-06 draft -- positiveInteger/seconds

["Rob Enns" <rpe@juniper.net>]

Thanks all. Sounds to me like the positiveInteger/seconds 
proposal for confirm-timeout has WG consensus. Change made.

Rob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Petch
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 12:05 PM
> To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: few comments on the prot-06 draft -- 
> positiveInteger/seconds
> 
> same for me
> Tom Petch
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bob Natale" <Bob.Natale@AppliedSNMP.com>
> To: <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 8:22 PM
> Subject: Re: few comments on the prot-06 draft -- 
> positiveInteger/seconds
> 
> 
> > Since overall WG feedback was sought:
> > 
> > I share Juergen's position on both questions -- 
> positiveInteger and seconds.
> > 
> > BobN
> > 
> > ---- Original message ----
> > >Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 07:32:09 +0200
> > >From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>  
> > >Subject: Re: few comments on the prot-06 draft  
> > >To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
> > >Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "Steven Berl (sberl)" 
> > <sberl@cisco.com>, netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> > >
> > >On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:10:54AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > >
> > >> I do not think there is consensus to make any change at 
> this time.
> > >> 
> > >> I wonder what the rest of the WG thinks?
> > >
> > >I think positiveInteger is what we should use and I like the idea
> > >to allow for a resolution in seconds.
> > >
> > >/js
> > >
> > >Juergen Schoenwaelder     International University Bremen
> > ><http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>     P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>