Re: Issue I002 (Was Re: Proposed Resolution to PROT I-D Issues List)

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 05:25 PM 2/11/2005, Phil Shafer wrote:
>Margaret Wasserman writes:
>>I have suggested in the past that the server should return the 
>>session ID to the client in the server's <hello> message.  Is there 
>>some reason why that is impractical or undesirable?
>
>Nope, sounds good.

Okay, now let's help Rob understand the edits.
Here's the <hello> example from the draft:

OLD:
   <hello>
     <capabilities>
       <capability>
         urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0
       </capability>
       <capability>
         urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0#startup
       </capability>
       <capability>
         http:/example.net/router/2.3/core#myfeature
       </capability>
    </capabilities>
   </hello>

NEW:

   <hello>
      <capabilities>
         ...
      </capabilities>
      <session-id>4</session-id>
   </hello>

<element name="session-id" type="positiveInteger"/>

okay?


>Thanks,
> Phil

Andy




>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>