Re: On box implementation

["David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>]

HI,

Following up on this further, the JunoScript guide (found at the following
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos53/junoscript53-guide/download/junoscript53-guide.pdf)
provides instructions for mapping between the config files and the
XML.
 
At 01:51 PM 7/2/2002 -0700, David T. Perkins wrote:
>HI,
>
>Ran - sorry, I really disagree with you on this. To me, the
>following little configuration fragment is an easy translation
>to XML, not C code. 
>
>protocols {
>  ospf {
>    area 0.0.0.0 {
>      interface so-0/0/0 {
>        hello-interval 5;
>      }
>      interface so-0/0/1 {
>        hello-interval 5;
>      }
>    }
>  }
>}
>
>Just because it has {} and ";", doesn't make it look like C code.
>
>The above is just a hierarchical tagged set of values, just like
>an XML document!
>
>At 03:53 PM 7/2/2002 -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 03:38 PM, David T. Perkins wrote:
>>
>>>HI,
>>>
>>>Glenn - the Juniper case is somewhat untypical because the CLI
>>>looks like XML.
>>
>>Umm.  No, that is not correct.
>>
>>        Juniper has a non-XML CLI user interface.  The Juniper CLI's UI
>>looks a lot more like the C programming language than anything else.
>>
>>Ran
>>rja@extremenetworks.com

Regards,
/david t. perkins


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>