Re: On box implementation

["David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>]

HI,

Ran - sorry, I really disagree with you on this. To me, the
following little configuration fragment is an easy translation
to XML, not C code. 

protocols {
  ospf {
    area 0.0.0.0 {
      interface so-0/0/0 {
        hello-interval 5;
      }
      interface so-0/0/1 {
        hello-interval 5;
      }
    }
  }
}

Just because it has {} and ";", doesn't make it look like C code.

The above is just a hierarchical tagged set of values, just like
an XML document!

At 03:53 PM 7/2/2002 -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote:

>On Tuesday, July 2, 2002, at 03:38 PM, David T. Perkins wrote:
>
>>HI,
>>
>>Glenn - the Juniper case is somewhat untypical because the CLI
>>looks like XML.
>
>Umm.  No, that is not correct.
>
>        Juniper has a non-XML CLI user interface.  The Juniper CLI's UI
>looks a lot more like the C programming language than anything else.
>
>Ran
>rja@extremenetworks.com

Regards,
/david t. perkins


--
to unsubscribe send a message to xmlconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/xmlconf/>