[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: urgent check
- To: "Mreview \(E-mail\)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: urgent check
- From: "Randy Presuhn" <rpresuhn@bmc.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:22:53 -0800
- References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550200@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
Hi -
> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
> To: "Mreview (E-mail)" <mreview@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:31 AM
> Subject: urgent check
>
> If you look at document
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsp-ipsecpib-06.txt
>
> And you look at the use of OBJECT-IDENTITY at the beginning of
> the PIB module. Do we agree that that is proper use?
> Is it not better to use OBJECT IDENTIFIER for most of these?
...
Although past practice has been to use OBJECT IDENTIFIER in
these situations, I don't know of anything in the specs that would
forbid using OBJECT-IDENTITY here. It's just not one of the
cases where OBJECT-IDENTITY would be *required*.
Randy