[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: normative/informative references in MIB boilerplate

Bert,

Thank you. I will use this split for the next versions
of the ROHC MIB until we have a new boilerplate.

   Juergen

-- Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote on 29 October 2002 12:04 +0100:


Juergens answer is the one I would give.
Current split is:


>
> Normative        Informative
> ----------       ------------
>  1905                1155
>  1906                1157
>                      1212
>                      1215
>  2571                1901
>  2572                2570
>  2573
>  2574
>  2575
>  2578
>  2579
>  2580
>


Thanks,
Bert


-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
Sent: dinsdag 29 oktober 2002 10:34
To: quittek@ccrle.nec.de
Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: normative/informative references in MIB boilerplate



>>>>> Juergen Quittek writes:

Juergen> Dear editor of the boilerplate for IETF MIBs,

That is probably me...

Juergen> When writing a MIB mudule for robust header compression, I
Juergen> was asked by the ROHC WG chairs to separate normative and
Juergen> informative references.  I can do so for the ROHC specific
Juergen> references, but I am not sure about the references in the
Juergen> boilerplate.

Juergen> Is there a version of the boilerplate showing this
Juergen> separation?

No. The plan is to update the boilerplate once the final SNMPv3
specifications are published, which hopefully does not take long
anymore.

Juergen> Or do you consider all referneces to be normative for MIBs?

No. There was a thread on this subject on this list back in March 2002
under the subject "normative vs. informative references in MIB
boilerplate".

/js

--
Juergen Schoenwaelder

<http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>