RE: normative/informative references in MIB boilerplate

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Juergens answer is the one I would give.
Current split is:

> > 
> > Normative        Informative
> > ----------       ------------
> >  1905                1155
> >  1906                1157
> >                      1212
> >                      1215
> >  2571                1901
> >  2572                2570
> >  2573
> >  2574
> >  2575
> >  2578
> >  2579
> >  2580
> > 
> 

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 oktober 2002 10:34
> To: quittek@ccrle.nec.de
> Cc: mibs@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: normative/informative references in MIB boilerplate
> 
> 
> 
> >>>>> Juergen Quittek writes:
> 
> Juergen> Dear editor of the boilerplate for IETF MIBs,
> 
> That is probably me...
> 
> Juergen> When writing a MIB mudule for robust header compression, I
> Juergen> was asked by the ROHC WG chairs to separate normative and
> Juergen> informative references.  I can do so for the ROHC specific
> Juergen> references, but I am not sure about the references in the
> Juergen> boilerplate.
> 
> Juergen> Is there a version of the boilerplate showing this
> Juergen> separation?
> 
> No. The plan is to update the boilerplate once the final SNMPv3
> specifications are published, which hopefully does not take long
> anymore.
> 
> Juergen> Or do you consider all referneces to be normative for MIBs?
> 
> No. There was a thread on this subject on this list back in March 2002
> under the subject "normative vs. informative references in MIB
> boilerplate".
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder    
<http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>