Re: INET-ADDRESS-MIB

[Jon Saperia <saperia@jdscons.com>]

> 
> >>>>> Jon Saperia writes:
> 
> Jon> If you say you are done and what the draft to move forward, then
> Jon> one would expect that there will not be any meaningful changes to
> Jon> the tc descriptions. Is this correct?
> 
> There will be another revision which will have changes as discussed
> before on this list. And once the next revision is out, we hopefully
> have last call on it - but who knows what happens then. If you want
> something really stable, wait for the RFC.

The piece of information that you provided that I did not have is that
the changes are agreed to (at least by those who participated in the
discussion) and so substantial changes are not as likely.

This informantion now makes it more sensible, at least from my view, to
have a last call when you publish the changes. Since I have not seen
them lets rewind back to my first question: when will you publish the
updates you noted above.  Thanks for telling me about RFCs and stability.

> 
> (Still wondering why all this is relevant for submitting an ID but I
>  better move on now.)
> 
> /js
> 
You bet, you have seen the last from me on this topic.

Thanks,
/jon
--

Jon Saperia		     saperia@jdscons.com
			     Phone: 617-744-1079
			     Fax:   617-249-0874
			     http://www.jdscons.com/