[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] Newbie's questions implementing the [IDNA]

My question expected just a simple response:
- either yes, the proposed draft permits to defeat TMs rights on a great scale in using what you call "unfortunate collisions" and others call "babel names".
- or no, it does not (and may be why).
jfc

At 17:22 11/12/02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 04:50:00PM +0100,
 JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> My program tells:
> u+0063 u+006F u+0B69 u+0B69 u+0063 u+0061 . fr
> are we in agreement?

Yes. That's the good thing with standards :-) But I used the official
Unicode names to make easier to see there are no semantics in the
Unicode string.

> about u+A317.com? Even then it will print in most of the cases as
> iesg-ibm.com.

It's u+3A17 and it does not seem registered at this time (although I
agree that such unfortunate collisions are possible, I simply believe
they are very uncommon).




---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 06/12/02