Oops: > I still don't see the point of this passage. It sounds as though some > other standards organization would be better equipped to develop a > character set than SC 2/WG 1 or UTC, but we're going with Unicode > anyway, just for the sake of expediency. Is that the intent? If not, > what purpose does the "which" clause serve? SC 2/WG 2 -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California