[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] length restrictions on IDN label

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [idn] length restrictions on IDN label
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 07:16:50 -0700
Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1034684903.6816.nordmark@bebop.france>
Organization: Silicon Valley / Public Access Link
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1034684903.6816.nordmark@bebop.france>
Reply-to: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@svpal.org>

Erik,

Tuesday, October 15, 2002, 5:28:23 AM, you wrote:
EN> It isn't independent since the limit derives from the label length limit
...
EN> The fact that punycode will never generate a string with less number of
EN> code points than the number of code points in the input is far from
EN> obvious, hence it makes sense in my mind to state this limit.

makes sense.  thanks.

/d
-----
Dave <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

References:
- Re: [idn] length restrictions on IDN label
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: [idn] Re: IDNA problem statement
Next by Date: Re: [idn] Re: IDNA problem statement
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] length restrictions on IDN label
Next by thread: [idn] ITU position.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread