Re: [idn] Document Status?

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>]

>     and MUST NOT assume that clients issuing queries or interpreting
>     responses will have any knowledge of zone-specific restrictions or
>     conventions.
> 
> I'd rather not insert requirements into the terminology section.
> Couldn't we say "have no impact" and "cannot assume that clients"?

Makes sense, but then I think we need to find a different place in
the document where it makes sense to state the requirement.

Perhaps we can find a new place in the document outside of the 
terminology section where all of this text can be put with the requirements
language.

 Erik