Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> wrote: > Adam, the documents are with IESG, and as that is the case it is > _extremely_ confusing and bad to have the wg continue to discuss > wording changes. > > If issues are rised by the IESG, or by other means, which makes the AD > request wording changes, _then_ is the time to discuss wordings. Okay, sorry, this is my first time through the process. AMC