Re: [idn] 1st stringprep issue: not answered and ignored

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>]

> Stringprep should have contained warnings about this or included new revised
> casefolding operatins/tables, but it didn't . the authors and co-chairs have
> ignored this repeated warnings  without any responses in this list. This is
> not a theoretical issue,  but a practical issue because the sequences are
> used by modern east-europeans.

What type of warning would make sense in stringprep?

Is there some warning that makes sense in IDNA as well?

Do you have suggested text that folks can review?

  Erik