[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should

To: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:18:26 -0800
Cc: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20020131220551.GB22764@nicemice.net>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131133906.01c582a8@127.0.0.1><33122220.1012465219@localhost><Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france><20020130043102.GE32582@nicemice.net><Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france><5.1.0.14.0.20020130142626.0175ee70@127.0.0.1><33122220.1012465219@localhost><5.1.0.14.2.20020131133906.01c582a8@127.0.0.1>

At 10:05 PM 1/31/2002 +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote:
>I will do that in any case.  The question is whether those words will be
>all-caps or not.

all-caps is the standard practise in the IETF.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464

References:
- Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] stringprep comment 2
Next by Date: RE: [idn] stringprep comment 1
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Next by thread: RE: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread