[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should

To: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:27:39 +0000
In-reply-to: <33122220.1012465219@localhost>
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france> <20020130043102.GE32582@nicemice.net> <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1012393824.16186.nordmark@bebop.france> <5.1.0.14.0.20020130142626.0175ee70@127.0.0.1> <33122220.1012465219@localhost>
Reply-to: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i

Am I the only one who prefers must/should/etc. over MUST/SHOULD/etc?  If
there is anyone else, please speak up now.

If there is no rough consensus, I can only use my own best judgement,
but if everyone agrees except me, I'll go along.  (This pertains to the
Punycode draft).

AMC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
  - From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>

References:
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Adam M. Costello" <idn.amc+0@nicemice.net.RemoveThisWord>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
  - From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Previous by thread: Re: [idn] IDN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: [idn] MUST/SHOULD vs. must/should
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread