|
Hi,
Sorry to seem impertinent.
Cannot audio conferencing facility be made so that
those who cannot make it physically can participate at least to some
extent.
With rgds
jayasurya
Wipro Technologies
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:55 PM
Subject: RE: Proposed agenda / should we meet?
Hi
all,
sorry
for the late confirmation, but I agree with Paul and think that we should meet
in Atlanta.
Since
the WG meeting is canceled, we should at least plan to meet among
those
present in Atlanta anyway.
Martin
Hi Mark,
I will be there to present and discuss the threat model draft
on behalf of Abbie Barbir, the draft editor. I certainly vote to hold
the meeting as planned.
Regards,
Paul Knight
> -----Original Message-----
>
From: Mark Day [mailto:markday@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject:
Proposed agenda / should we meet?
>
>
> Below is a proposed
agenda for a meeting in Atlanta. However,
> I
recently learned that neither the editor of the new threat
> model nor the editor of the architecture document will be
> present. So if we are meeting I need substitutes
to (a)
> present the open issues for those
documents and (b) own the
> task of capturing any
changes or solutions that come out of
> the
meeting.
>
> If we can't
hit critical mass to make some sort of meaningful
>
progress in Atlanta, I expect I will cancel the meeting.
>
> --Mark
>
>
> Content Distribution
Internetworking (CDI)
>
> Thursday November 21, 1300-1500
>
> Chair: Mark Day <markday@cisco.com>
>
> Agenda:
>
> Review of status of all group drafts
(5 min)
>
> MODEL
draft-ietf-cdi-model-02
> KNOWN-MECHANISMS
draft-ietf-cdi-known-request-routing-01
>
ARCHITECTURE draft-ietf-cdi-architecture-01
>
RR-REQS draft-ietf-cdi-request-routing-reqs-01
>
AAA-REQS draft-ietf-cdi-aaa-reqs-01
> SCENARIOS
draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios-01
> THREATS
draft-ietf-cdi-threat-00
> DIST-REQS [No draft
currently available]
>
>
Summary of goals, open issues in THREATS (20 min)
>
> Discussion (20 min)
>
> Summary of non-THREATS-related open issues in
drafts (20 min).
>
>
Discussion (40 min)
>
>
>
>
>
|