[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Proposed agenda / should we meet?



Title: RE: Proposed agenda / should we meet?
Hi all,
 
sorry for the late confirmation, but I agree with Paul and think that we should meet in Atlanta.
Since the WG meeting is canceled, we should at least plan to meet among those
present in Atlanta anyway.
 
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of Paul Knight
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 05:02 PM
To: Mark Day; cdn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Proposed agenda / should we meet?

Hi Mark,

I will be there to present and discuss the threat model draft on behalf of Abbie Barbir, the draft editor.  I certainly vote to hold the meeting as planned.

Regards,
Paul Knight


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Day [mailto:markday@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Proposed agenda / should we meet?
>
>
> Below is a proposed agenda for a meeting in Atlanta. However,
> I recently learned that neither the editor of the new threat
> model nor the editor of the architecture document will be
> present. So if we are meeting I need substitutes to (a)
> present the open issues for those documents and (b) own the
> task of capturing any changes or solutions that come out of
> the meeting.
>
> If we can't hit critical mass to make some sort of meaningful
> progress in Atlanta, I expect I will cancel the meeting.
>
> --Mark
>
>
> Content Distribution Internetworking (CDI)
>
> Thursday November 21, 1300-1500
>
> Chair: Mark Day <markday@cisco.com>
>
> Agenda:
>
> Review of status of all group drafts (5 min)
>
> MODEL draft-ietf-cdi-model-02
> KNOWN-MECHANISMS draft-ietf-cdi-known-request-routing-01
> ARCHITECTURE draft-ietf-cdi-architecture-01
> RR-REQS draft-ietf-cdi-request-routing-reqs-01
> AAA-REQS draft-ietf-cdi-aaa-reqs-01
> SCENARIOS draft-ietf-cdi-scenarios-01
> THREATS draft-ietf-cdi-threat-00
> DIST-REQS [No draft currently available]
>
> Summary of goals, open issues in THREATS (20 min)
>
> Discussion (20 min)
>
> Summary of non-THREATS-related open issues in drafts (20 min).
>
> Discussion (40 min)
>
>
>
>
>