RE: Not in Yokohama?

["Lisa Amini" <aminil@us.ibm.com>]

I will not be able to participate in Yokohama.

--Lisa

Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>@ops.ietf.org on 06/13/2002
02:33:48 PM

Sent by:    owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org


To:    "Martin May" <mmay@activia.net>
cc:    "Mark Day" <markday@cisco.com>, <cdn@ops.ietf.org>
Subject:    RE: Not in Yokohama?




I will be in Yokohama too.

Oliver

Martin May writes:
 > Mark,
 >
 > I also expect to be in Yokohama and I think we should have our meeting.
 > However, it would be nice to know who plans to attend.
 >
 > Martin
 >
 > -> -----Original Message-----
 > -> From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
 Of
 > -> Mark Day
 > -> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 04:32 PM
 > -> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
 > -> Subject: Not in Yokohama?
 > ->
 > ->
 > -> Although we have made some useful progress in the group (forwarding
 the
 > -> model, scenarios, and known-mechanisms drafts to the IESG) I
 > -> have not seen
 > -> much activity lately that would suggest that we should be meeting at
 the
 > -> next IETF get-together.  In particular, the only new draft has been
 Dave
 > -> Frascone's AAA work, which has drawn little comment.
 > ->
 > -> I have received informal indications from some people that they
 > -> are unlikely
 > -> to be able to attend even if we arrange a slot for a WG meeting.
 > ->
 > -> I expect to be in Japan anyway for other WGs, so I don't mind
 > -> which way we
 > -> decide.  But my current sense is that CDI will not be meeting in
 > -> Yokohama.
 > -> If you feel otherwise, this is your opportunity to convince me, Phil,
 and
 > -> the rest of the group into shifting the rough consensus I currently
 > -> perceive.
 > ->
 > -> --Mark
 > ->
 > ->
 > ->
 > ->
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >