i will be able to attend
abbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Cooper [mailto:ian@the-coopers.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:25 PM
> To: Martin May; cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: Mark Day
> Subject: RE: Not in Yokohama?
>
>
> --On Thursday, June 13, 2002 17:55 +0200 Martin May
> <mmay@activia.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Mark,
> >
> > I also expect to be in Yokohama and I think we should have
> our meeting.
> > However, it would be nice to know who plans to attend.
> >
> > Martin
>
> I can't be there, but I'd echo Mark's earlier comments - I've
> not seen any
> (much) new activity that suggests that a face-to-face meeting
> is necessary
> at this point. (Unless there have been design team meetings
> going on and
> they need face-to-face time?)
>
> >
> > -> -----Original Message-----
> > -> From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org
[mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf
> Of -> Mark Day
> -> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 04:32 PM
> -> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> -> Subject: Not in Yokohama?
> ->
> ->
> -> Although we have made some useful progress in the group (forwarding the
> -> model, scenarios, and known-mechanisms drafts to the IESG) I
> -> have not seen
> -> much activity lately that would suggest that we should be meeting at
> the -> next IETF get-together. In particular, the only new draft has
> been Dave -> Frascone's AAA work, which has drawn little comment.
> ->
> -> I have received informal indications from some people that they
> -> are unlikely
> -> to be able to attend even if we arrange a slot for a WG meeting.
> ->
> -> I expect to be in Japan anyway for other WGs, so I don't mind
> -> which way we
> -> decide. But my current sense is that CDI will not be meeting in
> -> Yokohama.
> -> If you feel otherwise, this is your opportunity to convince me, Phil,
> and -> the rest of the group into shifting the rough consensus I currently
> -> perceive.
> ->
> -> --Mark
> ->
> ->
> ->
> ->
>
>
>
>