RE: Publish Draft

[Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>]

Filling in for Abbie I will also have a slightly updated version of:
draft-cain-cdi-cnap-xx.txt . Do you want to resubmit that as WG
draft too?

Oliver

Mark Day writes:
 > I will resubmit the following drafts with draft-ietf-cdi-* filenames before
 > this Friday's cutoff.
 > 
 > draft-day-cdnp-model-09.txt
 > draft-day-cdnp-scenarios-04.txt
 > draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-03.txt
 > draft-cain-cdnp-known-request-routing-04.txt
 > draft-cain-request-routing-req-03.txt
 > draft-amini-cdi-distribution-reqs-02.txt
 > draft-gilletti-cdnp-aaa-reqs-01.txt
 > 
 > Then we can get them all moved to WG drafts listed on the charter page.
 > 
 > Below is the relevant part of the process, from
 > http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt
 > 
 > --Mark
 > 
 > "If the document is a new one (i.e. starting with revision -00.txt) and
 > is submitted as a working group document, the IETF secretariat will ask
 > the chair(s) of the wg the permission to publish it as a working group
 > document.  To expedite the process, authors are encouraged to send the
 > document to internet-drafts@ietf.org and at the same time cc: to the
 > chair(s) of the working group.  If the document is accepted as a
 > working group document, then it will have the draft-ietf-<working group
 > acronym> file name and will be announced on the working group mailing
 > list by the IETF Secretariat.  If the document is not accepted as a
 > working group document, it will be processed as an individual
 > submission, where the filename will be draft-<yourname>-....txt.
 > 
 > "NOTE: Revision numbers are based on the filename (as in first, second,
 >       or third version of this document). If there is a filename
 > change, the version number starts over at -00. Put another way, the
 > prior version number will NOT be incremented when an Internet-Draft
 > filename has changed. ALL FILES BEGIN at -00"
 > 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
 > Abbie Barbir
 > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:40 AM
 > To: Fred Douglis
 > Cc: cdn@ops.ietf.org
 > Subject: RE: Publish Draft
 > 
 > 
 > fred,
 > i was thinking the same way.
 > Mark, what is the process?
 > abbie
 > 
 > 
 > > -----Original Message-----
 > > From: Fred Douglis [mailto:douglis@research.att.com]
 > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:29 AM
 > > To: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A00:EXCH]
 > > Cc: cdn@ops.ietf.org
 > > Subject: Re: Publish Draft
 > >
 > >
 > > Now that it's a formal WG, is it appropriate to rename this
 > > and other I-Ds
 > > under the ietf-cdi framework?
 > >
 > > I realize that brings it back to -00, which has implications
 > > for deadlines and
 > > such, but I'm just wondering about the transition path.
 > >
 > > Fred
 > >
 > >
 > 
 >