RE: Publish Draft

["Mark Day" <markday@cisco.com>]

I will resubmit the following drafts with draft-ietf-cdi-* filenames before
this Friday's cutoff.

draft-day-cdnp-model-09.txt
draft-day-cdnp-scenarios-04.txt
draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-03.txt
draft-cain-cdnp-known-request-routing-04.txt
draft-cain-request-routing-req-03.txt
draft-amini-cdi-distribution-reqs-02.txt
draft-gilletti-cdnp-aaa-reqs-01.txt

Then we can get them all moved to WG drafts listed on the charter page.

Below is the relevant part of the process, from
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt

--Mark

"If the document is a new one (i.e. starting with revision -00.txt) and
is submitted as a working group document, the IETF secretariat will ask
the chair(s) of the wg the permission to publish it as a working group
document.  To expedite the process, authors are encouraged to send the
document to internet-drafts@ietf.org and at the same time cc: to the
chair(s) of the working group.  If the document is accepted as a
working group document, then it will have the draft-ietf-<working group
acronym> file name and will be announced on the working group mailing
list by the IETF Secretariat.  If the document is not accepted as a
working group document, it will be processed as an individual
submission, where the filename will be draft-<yourname>-....txt.

"NOTE: Revision numbers are based on the filename (as in first, second,
      or third version of this document). If there is a filename
change, the version number starts over at -00. Put another way, the
prior version number will NOT be incremented when an Internet-Draft
filename has changed. ALL FILES BEGIN at -00"

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
Abbie Barbir
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:40 AM
To: Fred Douglis
Cc: cdn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Publish Draft


fred,
i was thinking the same way.
Mark, what is the process?
abbie


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Douglis [mailto:douglis@research.att.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:29 AM
> To: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A00:EXCH]
> Cc: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Publish Draft
>
>
> Now that it's a formal WG, is it appropriate to rename this
> and other I-Ds
> under the ietf-cdi framework?
>
> I realize that brings it back to -00, which has implications
> for deadlines and
> such, but I'm just wondering about the transition path.
>
> Fred
>
>