[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: IETF52 CDI BOF minutes



Reminder... I need any edits to these ASAP... I'm going to send them out on
Monday.

--
Phil


>X-Sender: philr@inkt-3.inktomi.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
>Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 14:44:19 -0800
>To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
>From: "Phil Rzewski" <philr@inktomi.com>
>Subject: IETF52 CDI BOF minutes
>Sender: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org
>
>Enclosed are the minutes from the IETF52 CDI BOF, courtesy of Michael Speer
>from Sun. Apologies for these coming out so late. Please respond with any
>corrections or additions so I can send these in before the deadline next
week.
>
>-----
>Content Distribution Internetworking Minutes
>IETF 52, Salt Lake City, Utah
>By Michael Speer
>
>Chaired by: Mark Day, Cisco
>            Phil Rzewski, Inktomi Corporation
>
>Charter Status (Mark Day):
>-------------------------
>
>At the end of IETF 51, the IAB (Internet Architecture Board) was put
>in charge of deciding the fate of the CDI group.  Status is unclear
>at this moment in time.
>
>Area Director Ned Freed stated that the Charter of the CDI Group was
>on the agenda for the 20th of December and he was reasonably certain
>that the working group was to be chartered soon.
>
>Group Activity (Mark Day):
>-------------------------
>
>New versions of all documents except the architecture and AAA documents
>are available.  Two documents the models document and the "Known Content
>Network Request Routing Mechanisms" document had made it through group
>last call.
>
>IAB member Leslie Daigle reminded us that we are not a working group
>yet, thus the documents are merely in a holding pattern and open to question.
>
>New drafts have emerged for "Known Mechanisms for Content Internetworking",
>the "Content Network Advertisement Protocol (CNAP)", and "Data Compression
>for CNAP".
>
>Model Document Review (Mark Day):
>--------------------------------
>
>The model document introduces the reader to the concept of Content
>Interneworking and gives us a shared vocabulary to use.
>
>Status:  
>    - Document has passed group last call
>    - Completeness is hard to judge since other documents need to completed
>    - Ready to submit to the IESG against the group's proposed
>      charter.
>
>Content Network Request Routing Mechanisms (Abbie Barbir):
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>The Request Routing Document is pretty complete at this point.
>
>Status:
>    - Working group last call complete.
>    - Need to submit as information RFC
>
>Scenarios Draft (Phil Rzewski):
>
>------------------------------
>
>Describes some types of CNs (Content Networks) including Publishing Content
>Networks, Brokering Content Networks, Local Request-Routing Content Networks,
>and Regional vs. Global Content Networks.
>
>Status:
>    - Synced with the Models document for terminology consistency
>    - Stopped enumerating every possibility.
>    - Removed the accounting scenarios.
>    - Next Steps:
>       - Silence is acceptance?  People need to provide feedback.
>       - Group last call Jan 15th
>
>Architecture Overview Document (Phil Rzewski, Gary Tomlinson not present):
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

>Still waiting for an updated version of this document.  Gary plans to
>have at the end of December.
>
>Request Routing Requirements Document (Abbie Barbir):
>----------------------------------------------------
>
>Introduction to the Request Routing Systems.  Details the components of
>such systems and provides the requirements needed from a request routing
>protocol.
>
>Status:
>    - Would like to move the draft to last call
>    - Need to complete the security section.
>    - Need feedback !!!!
>
>Comments from the Audience:
>
>Tom Hardie:  Section 3.3 is somewhat problematic.  Can it or will it lead to
>    route looping?
>
>Distribution Requirements Document (Oliver Spatscheck, AT&T):
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>This document describes the requirements for interconnecting Distribution
>Systems of Content Networks.  It includes the description and requirements
>for: Distribution Advertising, Content Signaling, and Content Replication.
>
>Status and Major Issues:
>
>    - Need to add examples.
>    - Security Hop-by-hop?
>       - IPSec, Secrecy, authentication
>    - End to End Security.
>    - Please provide comments and input
>
>Accounting Requirements Document (Mark Day):
>-------------------------------------------
>
>Shelve it or keep it.  Document needs a new owner and new energy.
>
>Content Network Advertisement Protocol (Abbie, Nortel Networks):
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>CNAP is simple protocol to provide content and area advertisement.  It is
>derived from the request routing requirements document.  The protocol is
>used between CNs to exchange realtime data.  The protocol is text-based
>and uses TCP as its transport.
>
>Status:
>    - Is the scope of the protocol correct?
>    - Should it be text based.
>
>Comments:
>
>    - Tom Hardie: What is the interaction between CNAP Area prefixes
>      and the underlying routing system?  The working group really
>      needs to consider this interaction.
>
>    - Mark Day: What is the sense about the evolution of CNAP?  Does
>      it capture the requirements of the Request Routing System?
>
>    - Darrel Newcomb:  What is the proposal for state and Aggregation
>      of advertisements?
>
>Open Discussion (Phil Rzewski):
>------------------------------
>
>    - Is there a good reason to aggregate OPES, WEBI, and CDI to find
>      common models and definition?
>    
>      Michael Condry: Over the the content perspective is a good one.
>
>      Abbie: It is a good idea to find commonality.  Maybe we need
>      an umbrella group to define layer 7.  OPES is not well defined.
>
>      Ian Cooper: Maybe RFC 3040 needs to be updates and WEBI should not
>      serve as the umbrella group.
>
>      David Martin:  We don't need another working group, just find the
>      common terminology.
> 
>--
>Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation                  
>650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax) 
> 
--
Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation                  
650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)