[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs
Just to let you know that a new draft has been submitted,
A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs
draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt
I hope that it will be added to the agenda.
----
Abbie Barbir, Ph.D.
Senior Designer
Nortel Networks
(613) 763 5229
Mark Day wrote:
> In case anyone had doubts, I plan to adjust the agenda of the CDNP BOF to
> include these drafts (at the same superficial 5-minute intro level as the
> other drafts). I will be submitting a new agenda with updated filenames etc.
> late today or (more likely) tomorrow.
>
> --Mark
>
> Mark Stuart Day
> Senior Scientist
> Cisco Systems
> +1 (781) 663-8310
> markday@cisco.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> > Phil Rzewski
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 2:19 AM
> > To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Notice on drafts
> >
> >
> > Greetings. I wanted to notify folks on this list of a few Internet Drafts
> > that were recently submitted to the IETF. They are:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-oacp-00.txt
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-cndistcs-00.txt
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-cnacct-00.txt
> >
> > Some may recall that I had made a post to this mailing list a few
> > weeks ago
> > expressing some worry about the use of the term "CDN Peering" and how it
> > seems to imply that the only networks that might want to be
> > "peered" at the
> > content layer are therefore being called "CDNs". One of my
> > worries was how
> > this might conflict with terminology that's already accepted in the
> > industry. However, I didn't want to belabor the point unless there were
> > written drafts that back it up.
> >
> > To put the drafts in context, they're an attempt to attack "Content
> > Peering" by looking at a specific implementation involving
> > different types
> > of networks (CDN, Hoster, Access) and how they fit together. Also FYI,
> > these drafts are an attempt to open up some of the "version 1.0"
> > functionality happening within the Content Bridge alliance.
> >
> > Because they're not specifically CDN-focused, this list may not be the
> > ideal place to request feedback. However, since this list is
> > looking toward
> > a BOF to discuss cross-network peering at the content layer, I
> > figure this
> > might be a good place to start. Hopefully folks will agree that
> > it's better
> > than trying to start a completely parallel "Content Peering"
> > standards effort.
> >
> > --
> > Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation
> > 650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)
> >
> >