RE: Notice on drafts

["Mark Day" <markday@cisco.com>]

In case anyone had doubts, I plan to adjust the agenda of the CDNP BOF to
include these drafts (at the same superficial 5-minute intro level as the
other drafts). I will be submitting a new agenda with updated filenames etc.
late today or (more likely) tomorrow.

--Mark

Mark Stuart Day
Senior Scientist
Cisco Systems
+1 (781) 663-8310
markday@cisco.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-cdn@ops.ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Phil Rzewski
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 2:19 AM
> To: cdn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Notice on drafts
>
>
> Greetings. I wanted to notify folks on this list of a few Internet Drafts
> that were recently submitted to the IETF. They are:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-oacp-00.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-cndistcs-00.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rzewski-cnacct-00.txt
>
> Some may recall that I had made a post to this mailing list a few
> weeks ago
> expressing some worry about the use of the term "CDN Peering" and how it
> seems to imply that the only networks that might want to be
> "peered" at the
> content layer are therefore being called "CDNs". One of my
> worries was how
> this might conflict with terminology that's already accepted in the
> industry. However, I didn't want to belabor the point unless there were
> written drafts that back it up.
>
> To put the drafts in context, they're an attempt to attack "Content
> Peering" by looking at a specific implementation involving
> different types
> of networks (CDN, Hoster, Access) and how they fit together. Also FYI,
> these drafts are an attempt to open up some of the "version 1.0"
> functionality happening within the Content Bridge alliance.
>
> Because they're not specifically CDN-focused, this list may not be the
> ideal place to request feedback. However, since this list is
> looking toward
> a BOF to discuss cross-network peering at the content layer, I
> figure this
> might be a good place to start. Hopefully folks will agree that
> it's better
> than trying to start a completely parallel "Content Peering"
> standards effort.
>
> --
> Phil Rzewski - Senior Architect - Inktomi Corporation
> 650-653-2487 (office) - 650-303-3790 (cell) - 650-653-1848 (fax)
>
>