Re: CDN Peering Architecture Overview <draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.txt> available

[Barron Housel <housel@cisco.com>]

Wouldn't "DIRECTING" be preferred over "DIRECTION" because "direction" is a
noun whereas "directing" is a participle showing action.
Barron Housel

Gary Tomlinson wrote:

> The CDN Peering Architecture Overview ID
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.txt> has
> been updated to rev 01 and is now available at IETF (HTML is also available
> at http://www.content-peering.org/draft-green-cdnp-gen-arch-01.html).
>
> I believe this version incorporates all of the changes and suggestions made
> at the 10/3 meeting along with comments received subsequently.  At this
> point, the consensus of the design team is we are ready to drill down and
> begin tackling the tougher machinery issues involved in each of the systems
> (DIRECTION, DISTRIBUTION, ACCOUNTING).  A lively discussion has begun on
> accounting, so we are making progress.  Work on a new ID "Known CDN
> Redirection Mechanisms" has begun which should help us drive the DIRECTION
> system forward as well.
>
> So far, we haven't gotten into DISTRIBUTION much yet.  Might I suggest we
> begin a thread on this subject, starting with the following disucssion
> points.
>
> a) Pull based distribution through SURROGATEs
> b) Push based pre-propolutation of individual objects to SURROGATEs
> c) Push based complete replication of objects sets to SURROGATEs
>
> As always, more scenarios for the
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-day-cdnp-scenarios-01.txt> ID
> will help us all in getting the architecture right.
>
> Gary