Update: WG last call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Hi all,

Just to give you an update on the dependency on OSPFv3-TE.

The ADs and OSPF working group chairs have agreed to re-submit the OSPFv3-TE 
draft and to last call it in the OSPF working group.

We can expect this to happen fairly soon (the I-D is already re-submitted) 
so it is OK for this CCAMP draft to keep its normative reference to the 
OSPFv3-TE draft.

The worst that will happen is that our draft will be held up in the RFC 
Editor's queue for a few extra weeks.

Adrian

> > OSPFv3-TE
> > I am currently trying to close an issue down
> > with the OSPF WG chairs and the ADs.
> > Your I-D includes extensions to OSPFv3-TE as
> > requested by the OSPF working group.
> > This means that you are correct to have the
> > OSPFv3-TE draft as a Normative reference.
> > However, the OSPFv3-TE draft is stalled in
> > the OSPF working group where:
> > - the draft has just expired
> > - there is more than one implementation
> > - there are no known deployments
> > - no interop testing has been done
> > This means that the OSPFv3-TE draft might not
> > advance for some time and might leave your
> > draft stalled in the RFC Editor queue.
> > I will update the working group as we make
> > progress on this issue.