Re: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...

[Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>]

Hello Greg,

You wrote:

> Hi CCAMPers, at the Vancouver meeting the status of the VCAT/LCAS
> draft was discussed and there seemed to be two possible additions to
> the requirements section of the draft. From the slide presentation
> these were:
>
> (a) Be able to set up member LSPs (and data plane LSPs -- server 
> connections) prior to creation of VCG (Virtual Concatenation Group).

If there are more such members would they have a relation with
each other? e.g. a "pool" of member LSPs for a single VCG or for
multiple VCGs that exist between the same end-points.

> (b) “Member” LSPs (data plane and control plane) can exist after a
> VCG using them has been removed.

Will they be returned to the "pool" (if the previous answer is yes).

> For those interested in VCAT/LCAS what is your opinion on these 
> additional requirements? This is a WG draft so polling of the list is
>  required (right Adrian?). I'll clean up the language if there is a 
> desire to add these to the current draft. Note that these
> requirements may break or require rework of the current "multiple
> co-signaled member sets" solution in the draft.

Cheers, Huub.

--
================================================================
                  http://www.van-helvoort.eu/
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...