RE: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...

["Diego Caviglia" <diego.caviglia@ericsson.com>]

Hi Greg,
        I think are good requirements and should be included on the ID may be not as mandatory requirements.

BR

Diego

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Greg Bernstein
> Sent: martedì 8 gennaio 2008 18.28
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...
> 
> Hi CCAMPers, at the Vancouver meeting the status of the VCAT/LCAS draft
> was discussed and there seemed to be two possible additions to the
> requirements section of the draft. From the slide presentation these were:
> 
> (a) Be able to set up member LSPs (and data plane LSPs -- server
> connections) prior to creation of VCG (Virtual Concatenation Group).
> (b) "Member" LSPs (data plane and control plane) can exist after a VCG
> using them has been removed.
> 
> For those interested in VCAT/LCAS what is your opinion on these
> additional requirements? This is a WG draft so polling of the list is
> required (right Adrian?). I'll clean up the language if there is a
> desire to add these to the current draft. Note that these requirements
> may break or require rework of the current "multiple co-signaled member
> sets" solution in the draft.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Greg B.
> 
> --
> ===================================================
> Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237
> 
>