RE: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...

["Ong, Lyndon" <Lyong@Ciena.com>]

Hi Greg,

As you might expect, I support adding these as requirements for the
VCAT/LCAS
work.

Cheers,

Lyndon 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Bernstein
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:28 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Moving forward with VCAT/LCAS...

Hi CCAMPers, at the Vancouver meeting the status of the VCAT/LCAS draft
was discussed and there seemed to be two possible additions to the
requirements section of the draft. From the slide presentation these
were:

(a) Be able to set up member LSPs (and data plane LSPs -- server
connections) prior to creation of VCG (Virtual Concatenation Group).
(b) "Member" LSPs (data plane and control plane) can exist after a VCG
using them has been removed.

For those interested in VCAT/LCAS what is your opinion on these
additional requirements? This is a WG draft so polling of the list is
required (right Adrian?). I'll clean up the language if there is a
desire to add these to the current draft. Note that these requirements
may break or require rework of the current "multiple co-signaled member
sets" solution in the draft.

Regards

Greg B.

--
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237