[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed CCAMP recharter

Hi Julien,


I agree with Dimitri about the use of the term "Ethernet". As we don't
control IP but MPLS-TE, we're looking into controlling a "connection-
oriented Ethernet" which isn't really Ethernet and not supported by
typical "Ethernet switches".
OK. I'll modify the text I just suggested to Dimitri, to say "connection-oriented" 


On the other hand, (echoing Dimitri again)
we are also considering Ethernet services over any GMPLS-controlled
layer.


Agree. But don't think we need milestones.
I also agree it is useless to rearrange all short-term milestones (unlike the 
charter which has a more long-term value).
I tend to agree, but I suspect that the IESG will find it hard to approve a re-charter with dates that have been passed. 

Thanks,
Adrian