RE: Polling for two new working group I-Ds

[Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>]

I support both ID's. 

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 10:33 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Polling for two new working group I-Ds

Hi,

In Chicago we considered the possibility of two new CCAMP drafts. Please 
give your opinions:

1. draft-chen-ccamp-isis-interas-te-extension-00.txt
This is a partner draft to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-00.txt
The draft was discussed at the ISIS working group and several questions of 
detail were raised.
Thus, accepting this I-D now, does not imply that we would not change the 
mechanism.

2. draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt
This work is a charter milestone, and Deborah and I are both co-authors, so 
we are likely to be influenced in favour of adoption. So please voice your 
opinions loud and clear.

Thanks,
Adrian