Re: Polling for two new working group I-Ds

[JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>]

Hi,

On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In Chicago we considered the possibility of two new CCAMP drafts.  
> Please give your opinions:
>
> 1. draft-chen-ccamp-isis-interas-te-extension-00.txt
> This is a partner draft to draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te- 
> extension-00.txt
> The draft was discussed at the ISIS working group and several  
> questions of detail were raised.
> Thus, accepting this I-D now, does not imply that we would not  
> change the mechanism.

Yes.

> 2. draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt
> This work is a charter milestone, and Deborah and I are both co- 
> authors, so we are likely to be influenced in favour of adoption.  
> So please voice your opinions loud and clear.

Yes.

Thanks.

JP.

> Thanks,
> Adrian