[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed CCAMP recharter



Good catch.
Should be...
and MPLS and GRE,

A
----- Original Message ----- From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>; <dward@cisco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed CCAMP recharter


In the 'first paragraph', I am puzzled by the change from
MPLS, GRE,
to
and MPLS GRE,
which seems a material, semantic change; is this intended?

Tom Petch


----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>; <dward@cisco.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:25 PM
Subject: Proposed CCAMP recharter


Hi,

As discussed at the meeting(s) we should consider a small recharter to put the GELS work clearly in scope and to indicate that we will work with IEEE
802.1 as necessary.

We should take the opportunity to rejig the milestones, but noting that a
bunch of (overdue) milestones are about to be completed it is moot whether
we should rearrange them all. Basically, I am too lazy to do that and
propose just to change the ones that are further out.

I would like to ask you all to look at this and comment. In particular: are
the document editors happy with these targets?

ADs - your opinions too, please.

The changes proposed are...
===
First paragraph
OLD
The CCAMP working group coordinates the work within the IETF defining a
common control plane and a separate common measurement plane for physical
path and core tunneling technologies of Internet and telecom service
providers (ISPs and SPs), e.g. O-O and O-E-O optical switches, ATM and Frame
Relay switches, MPLS, GRE, in cooperation with the MPLS WG.

NEW
The CCAMP working group coordinates the work within the IETF defining a
common control plane and a separate common measurement plane for physical
path and core tunneling technologies of Internet and telecom service
providers (ISPs and SPs), e.g. O-O and O-E-O optical switches, TDM switches,
Ethernet switches, ATM and Frame Relay switches, and MPLS GRE, in
cooperation with the MPLS WG.
===
Final paragraph
OLD
In doing this work, the WG will work closely with at least the following
other WGs: MPLS, ISIS, OSPF, IDR, L1VPN and PCE. The WG will also cooperate
with the ITU-T.

NEW
In doing this work, the WG will work closely with at least the following
other WGs: MPLS, ISIS, OSPF, IDR, L1VPN and PCE. The WG will also cooperate
with the ITU-T, and the IEEE 802.1.
===
Milestones (only those changed or new)

Aug 2007    First version WG I-D for Protocol solutions for MLN/MRN
Aug 2007    First version WG I-D GMPLS OAM Requirements
Sep 2007 Submit Informational I-D for Analysis of inter-domain issues for
disjoint and protected paths for IESG review
Sep 2007    Submit MPLS to GMPLS migration strategies I-D for IESG review
Sep 2007    Submit MPLS-GMPLS interworking requirements and solutions I-D
for IESG review
Sep 2007    First version WG I-Ds for control of Ethernet networks
Oct 2007    Submit Requirements for Multi-Layer and Multi-Region Networks
I-D for IESG review
Oct 2007    Submit Evaluation of existing protocols for MLN/MRN for IESG
review
Oct 2007    First version of WG I-D for additional MIB module to cover
RSVP-TE signaling extensions
Dec 2007 Submit OSPF-TE/GMPLS MIB module for MIB doctor and IESG review
Jan 2008    Submit ASON Routing solutions I-D for IESG review
Feb 2008    Submit GMPLS OAM Requirements I-D for IESG review
Mar 2008    Submit Protocol solutions for MLN/MRN I-D for IESG review
Apr 2008    Submit MIB module for RSVP-TE signaling extensions for MIB
doctor and IESG review
May 2008 Submit protocol extensions for control of Ethernet networks for
IESG review
Dec 2008    Recharter or close Working Group
====

Thanks,
Adrian