[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is fate-sharing a must for the bidirectional TE LSP?



In the current PWE3 standard, although there is no requirement for fate-sharing on the outer LSP tunnels, bidirectional service, including CES, ATM and FR, can be supported well over PWE3. Is there some difference between the service requirements on PWE3 and those on bidirectional TE LSP?

 

With the deployment of P2MP TE LSP, the bandwidth consumption over a link will become more asymmetric. The bidirectional TE LSP without fate-sharing requirement will maximize the utilization of the total network bandwidth resource because the forward LSP and backward LSP can travel over the different physical paths.

 

Any comment is welcomed.

 

 

Best regards,

 

Steven Xu